Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01538
Original file (BC 2014 01538.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01538
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His separation code of KND, which denotes “Miscellaneous/General 
Reasons,” be changed.

His Reentry (RE) code of 4H, which denotes serving suspended 
punishment to Article 15 be corrected.  (Administratively 
corrected)


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He never lost a stripe or got into trouble again while he was 
active duty.  

The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider 
his untimely application because he wants to join the Air Force 
Reserves. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 28 Apr 04, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.

On 30 Jun 10, the applicant received an honorable discharge, and 
was credited with 6 years, 2 months and 4 days of active 
service.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  Based on documentation in the master 
personnel records, the discharge to include the separation code, 
the narrative reason for separation and character of service was 
appropriately administered and within the discretion of the 
discharge authority.  

The applicant completed a voluntary separation application 
request using the Personnel Processing Application (PPA) on 
19 Apr 10, where he requested early separation for 
“Miscellaneous reasons,” with an effective date of separation of 
30 Jun 10.  The applicant’s commander recommended approval on 19 
Apr 10.  The separation authority approved the request and 
established an effective date of separation for 30 Jun 10, using 
the authority AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, 
chapter 3, section 3B, paragraph 3.15.  The applicant 
acknowledged receipt and began separation out-processing 
actions. 

The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the 
applicant on 13 Jun 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01538 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 30 May 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jun 14.					

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00845

    Original file (BC 2014 00845.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The applicant contends that the RE code “3A” is for members who separate before completing 36 months service. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04532

    Original file (BC 2013 04532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was informed by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Education Office that her separation code needs to be changed to reflect “COG” so the DVA can consider her eligibility for the MGIB. She was advised that the DVA will only consider her application if her separation code is changed to “COG.” She voluntarily separated under the FY04 Force Shaping Program; was offered the MGIB prior to separating and wants to use the benefit she paid into. However, according to the DVA letter dated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01864

    Original file (BC 2014 01864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Based on the discharge authority’s letter, dated 11 Apr 14, the applicant was involuntarily discharged for “Failure to Progress in Military Training Required to be Qualified for Service with Air Force or for Performance of Primary Duties.” Therefore, the correct RE code is “3A.” The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01392

    Original file (BC 2014 01392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Airmen are given entry-level separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. Airmen separated under this provision are not updated to a RE code of 2C.” In addition, DPSOY will provide the applicant a corrected copy of his DD Form 214 with an RE code of 3A, unless otherwise directed by the Board. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03735

    Original file (BC 2014 03735.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She submitted a DD Form 293, Application for Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces, for upgrade of her general discharge but it was denied by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 19 Jun 14. On 10 Sep 10 she was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) with a narrative reason for separation of “Misconduct (minor infractions),” and Reentry (RE) code “2B” which denotes “Discharged under General or other than honorable...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01296

    Original file (BC 2014 01296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Palace Chase.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The narrative reason for separation is incorrect as she went through the Palace Chase program under the 2014 Limited Active Duty Service Commitment (LADSC) Waiver Program. We took notice...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01525

    Original file (BC 2014 01525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice in the processing of the applicant’s discharge. On the other hand, personnel who chose not to separate under one of the voluntary programs, but remained in the Air Force, met a force Shaping...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00870

    Original file (BC 2014 00870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed to reflect “Reduction in Force” at the convenience of the government. His DD Form 214 reflects the narrative reason for separation as “Miscellaneous/General Reasons.” The remaining relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03589

    Original file (BC 2014 03589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03589 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended as follows: His separation code “JBK” which denotes “Completion of Required Active Service” be changed. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. The medical records provided by the applicant are noted; however, he has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360

    Original file (BC 2014 00360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code “JBK.” Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code “JBK.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...